COMPUTER

Doctors may soon start using computer predictions to judge and treat cancer patients after scientists created mathematical formulas that outdid human experts in forecasting how sufferers will respond to the treatment

A computer model of lung cancer made consistently better predictions of the future symptoms suffered by a set of patients undergoing chemotherapy than the doctors who actually treated them, scientists said, in a study that demonstrates the increasingly important role of mathematics in cancer medicine.

Personal medical details and the treatment history of each patient were fed into the computer model, which then offered  a better assessment than experienced radiation oncologists of how individuals were likely to respond over a two-year period, researchers said.

If models based on a patient, tumour and treatment characteristics already out-perform the doctors, then it is unethical to make treatment decisions based solely on the doctors opinion. We believe models should be implemented in clinical practice to guide decisions, said Dr Cary Oberije of Maastricht University Medical Hospital in The Netherlands.

Computer models and the mathematical analysis of cancer data is becoming increasingly important as more and more data is collected on individual patients, whether it is information from sophisticated computer scans or data on a persons genetic makeup.

Researchers have also shown that cancer tumours differ from person to person and so require different treatments depending on a persons genetic code  and the type or stage of each individuals cancer “ a process that also requires complex mathematical analysis.

Dr Oberije and colleagues used their mathematical model to make predictions of how many lung cancer patients in a group of 121 would still be alive after two years, how many will suffer breathing difficulties and how many will find it difficult to swallow.

For all three outcomes the model proved significantly better than the patients own doctors at making the correct prognosis, with the doctors predictions being little better than those expected by chance. In our opinion, individualised treatment can only succeed if prediction models are used in clinical practice. We have shown that current models already outperform doctors. Therefore, this study can be used as a strong argument in favour of using prediction models and changing current clinical practice, Dr Oberije said.

We know that there are many factors that play a role in the prognosis of patients and prediction models can combine them all Our study shows that it is very unlikely that a doctor can outperform a model, she added. As well as helping decide on treatment options for patients, good predictions are also important in deciding which patients can be used in clinical trials for new drugs, she said.

They are not perfect, but neither are humans and models are better than humans. They are a tool to help doctors, not to replace them, Dr Oberije said.  Professor Alan Ashworth, chief utive of the Institute of Cancer Research in London, said that mathematical modelling and computational science is becoming increasingly important as more and more data is collected on cancer genetics and diagnostics.  Mathematical formulas outdo doctors in forecasting patients responses, claims study. Doctors may soon start using computer predictions to judge and treat cancer patients after scientists created mathematical formulas that outdid human experts in forecasting how sufferers will respond to the treatment.

A computer model of lung cancer made consistently better predictions of the future symptoms suffered by a set of patients undergoing chemotherapy than the doctors who actually treated them, scientists said, in a study that demonstrates the increasingly important role of mathematics in cancer medicine. Personal medical details and the treatment history of each patient were fed into the computer model, which then offered a better assessment than experienced radiation oncologists of how individuals were likely to respond over a two-year period, researchers said.

If models based on a patient, tumour and treatment characteristics already out-perform the doctors, then it is unethical to make treatment decisions based solely on the doctors opinion. We believe models should be implemented in clinical practice to guide decisions, said Dr Cary Oberije of Maastricht University Medical Hospital in The Netherlands.

Computer models and the mathematical analysis of cancer data is becoming increasingly important as more and more data is collected on individual patients, whether it is information from sophisticated computer scans or data on a persons genetic makeup. Researchers have also shown that cancer tumours differ from person to person and so require different treatments depending on a persons genetic code and the type or stage of each individuals cancer “ a process that also requires complex mathematical analysis.  Dr Oberije and colleagues used their mathematical model to make predictions of how many lung cancer patients in a group of 121 would still be alive after two years, how many will suffer breathing difficulties and how many will find it difficult to swallow.

For all three outcomes the model proved significantly better than the patients own doctors at making the correct prognosis, with the doctors predictions being little better than those expected by chance. In our opinion, individualised treatment can only succeed if prediction models are used in clinical practice. We have shown that current models already outperform doctors. Therefore, this study can be used as a strong argument in favour of using prediction models and changing current clinical practice, Dr Oberije said.

We know that there are many factors that play a role in the prognosis of patients and prediction models can combine them all Our study shows that it is very unlikely that a doctor can outperform a model, she added. As well as helping decide on treatment options for patients, good predictions are also important in deciding which patients can be used in clinical trials for new drugs, she said. They are not perfect, but neither are humans and models are better than humans. They are a tool to help doctors, not to replace them, Dr Oberije said. Professor Alan Ashworth, chief utive of the Institute of Cancer Research in London, said that mathematical modelling and computational science is becoming increasingly important as more and more data is collected on cancer genetics and diagnostics.

Be a part of Elets Collaborative Initiatives. Join Us for Upcoming Events and explore business opportunities. Like us on Facebook , connect with us on LinkedIn and follow us on Twitter , Instagram.

Tags:

Related International


whatsapp--v1